The Bishop of Gloucester asked a question on the effectiveness of Ofcom during a discussion on the proliferation of non-consensual sexual deepfakes of women on X/Twitter on 14th January 2026:
The Lord Bishop of Gloucester: My Lords, I welcome moves by the Government on this issue. I came off X last September and there is wider debate to be had about that site. Given that we know that the use of AI tools to harm women will only accelerate—recent research has found thousands of nudification apps available—I repeat my question from earlier this week: what more will the Government do to create a robust framework so that AI will be used responsibly in the whole landscape of misogyny and abuse?
In relation to Ofcom, I heard what the Minister said about increased funding year on year, but why therefore does it seem that Ofcom does not have teeth?
Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Lab, DBT/DSIT): I thank the right reverend Prelate for her comments. In terms of Ofcom’s enforcement powers, it has imposed four financial penalties under the Online Safety Act, including of over £1 million. From the Government’s point of view, we are clear that it should be confident that it has our backing to use the powers that Parliament gave it, and we are resourcing it with the additional funding that we have provided. We believe that that is sufficient and we will see from its updates on its online safety activities exactly what it is doing, and that is part of its accountability to Parliament and the Government.
In terms of other things that we are taking forward, noble Lords will know that we are legislating in the Crime and Policing Bill to criminalise nudification tools. That offence will target tools that are specifically designed to generate non-consensual intimate images and make it illegal for companies to supply those tools.
The Church of England in Parliament 
You must be logged in to post a comment.