Diocesan Stipends Funds (Amendment): Bishop of Sheffield moves to pass Measure

On 27th June 2023, the Bishop of Sheffield moved a motion to direct that the Diocesan Stipends Funds (Amendment) Measure be presented to His Majesty the King for Royal Assent, and gave a speech in support of the motion:

The Lord Bishop of Sheffield: That this House do direct that, in accordance with the Church of England Assembly (Powers) Act 1919, the Diocesan Stipends Funds (Amendment) Measure be presented to His Majesty for the Royal Assent.

My Lords, I am not entirely surprised to discover that this Measure excites noble Members of the House rather less than the previous business.

In the medieval period, clergy were paid mainly from income derived from land owned by each parish, known as glebe land. The amount of land varied from parish to parish, and so accordingly did the income of the clergy. With the Industrial Revolution and the growth of cities, wealthy industrialists were often willing to give significant amounts of money to support the local church, often helping to build and endow the church in question. In my diocese of Sheffield, a number of large churches were built in this period thanks to the generosity of industrialists such as Samuel Fox, the founder of the local Stocksbridge steelworks.

Continue reading “Diocesan Stipends Funds (Amendment): Bishop of Sheffield moves to pass Measure”

Votes: Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill

On 27th June 2023, the House of Lords debated the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill in the second day of the report stage. Votes were held on amendments to the bill, in which Bishops took part:

Continue reading “Votes: Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill”

Votes: National Security Bill

On 21st June 2023, the House of Lords debated Commons amendments to the National Security Bill. Votes were held on further amendments to the bill, in which Bishops took part:

Continue reading “Votes: National Security Bill”

Votes: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

On 20th June 2023, the House of Lords debated the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill. Votes were held on amendments to the bill, in which Bishops took part:

Continue reading “Votes: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill”

British Nationality (Regularisation of Past Practice) Bill: Bishop of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich urges communication on legislation

The Bishop of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich spoke in a debate on the British Nationality (Regulation of Past Practice) Bill on 19th June 2023, requesting assurances from the government on their plans to expedite the intent and communication of the legislation once it had been passed:

The Lord Bishop of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich: My Lords, I thank the Minister for his clear and helpful introduction. I do not wish to detain the House long in offering my full support for the Bill, which addresses a vital issue. I should declare half an interest: my wife is German, so we have dual nationality children. Obviously, they do not fall within the scope of this, but noble Lords will appreciate why I may be attracted to issues such as this. I wholeheartedly welcome the Bill and commend the Government for the proactive steps they have taken speedily to address this unusual technical issue within the existing legal framework.

Continue reading “British Nationality (Regularisation of Past Practice) Bill: Bishop of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich urges communication on legislation”

Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill: Bishop of Sheffield makes maiden speech supporting efforts to increase access to higher education

The Bishop of Sheffield made his maiden speech during a debate on the Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill on 19th June 2023, speaking on his experience in Sheffield Diocese and highlighting potential challenges in the implementation of the bill:

The Lord Bishop of Sheffield: My Lords, I am grateful for the opportunity to speak for the first time in this Chamber, and in support of this Bill’s aim of widening access to higher education. I look forward to hearing the maiden speech of the noble Lord, Lord Sewell of Sanderstead. I record my thanks to Members and staff for the consistently warm and generous welcome I have received and the helpful induction I have been given. If my experience of introduction to this House is typical, it speaks very well of the culture of this place.

On Thursday, it will be exactly six years since I was consecrated as a bishop at York Minster and took up my present responsibilities. The wonderful diocese I serve is made up of former steel-making and coal-mining communities across much of south Yorkshire, farming communities in parts of the East Riding and even a port in the town of Goole. I had never lived in south Yorkshire before but have found the city of Sheffield astonishingly green—I believe it to be the only city in England with a national park within its boundary.

Continue reading “Lifelong Learning (Higher Education Fee Limits) Bill: Bishop of Sheffield makes maiden speech supporting efforts to increase access to higher education”

Coroners (Determination of Suicide) Bill [HL]: Bishop of St Albans moves that bill should pass

On 16th June 2023, the Bishop of St Albans’ Coroners (Determination of Suicide) Bill – which would require Coroners to enter a verdict on the case of suicide, with a view to ascertaining if the suicide was related to gambling – had its third reading in the House of Lords and passed to the House of Commons:  

The Lord Bishop of St Albans: That the Bill do now pass.

I hope noble Lords will grant me the indulgence of saying a few words about this Bill. In so doing, I declare my interest as a vice-chairman of Peers for Gambling Reform and a vice-president of the Local Government Association. I express my appreciation for those Members of the House who have been so helpful. This is the third iteration of this Bill that I have brought before your Lordships’ House, and I believe it has been radically improved. I thank my parliamentary researchers past and present, Sam Parker and Chris Grozdoski, and in particular the noble and learned Lord, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, and the noble Lord, Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, for their advice and valuable suggestions. I also thank members of Peers for Gambling Reform for their steadfast support as we have taken this Private Member’s Bill through your Lordships’ House.

Continue reading “Coroners (Determination of Suicide) Bill [HL]: Bishop of St Albans moves that bill should pass”

Illegal Migration Bill: Bishop of Durham supports Archbishop of Canterbury’s amendment on international refugee strategy

During a debate on committee amendments to the Illegal Migration Bill on 14th June 2023, the Bishop of Durham spoke in support of the Archbishop of Canterbury’s amendment to establish a long term strategy on tackling global refugee crises:

The Lord Bishop of Durham: My Lords, the most reverend Primate might be nervous—he did not know I was going to stand up and he has no clue about what I will say. But I will start by saying I fully support his amendment. I will ask the Minister about the Global Compact on Refugees. The UN has been seeking to develop a global strategy on refugees for a number of years, and it was my privilege to join the Home Office team dealing with the Syrian refugee crisis in Geneva in 2018, at its request. It asked me to make an address.

Continue reading “Illegal Migration Bill: Bishop of Durham supports Archbishop of Canterbury’s amendment on international refugee strategy”

Illegal Migration Bill: Archbishop of Canterbury tables amendment requiring government collaboration strategy to tackle global refugee crisis

On 14th June 2023, the House of Lords debated committee amendments to the Illegal Migration Bill. The Archbishop of Canterbury tabled an amendment that would insert a new clause requiring the Secretary of State to have a ten year strategy for collaborating internationally to tackle refugee crises driving people to enter the UK as refugees:

The Lord Archbishop of Canterbury: My Lords, I hope this section may be a bit shorter. As the noble Lord, Lord Deben, already knows, because he just said it, I am rising to introduce Amendment 139D tabled in my name and Amendment 144B, which is consequential to it. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy of The Shaws, and the noble Lords, Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth and Lord Blunkett, for co-signing it. I have had letters of apology from the noble Baroness, Lady Kennedy, and the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, who are not able to be here for very good and sufficient reasons.

I particularly appreciate when we come to this that the Government are taking action—I am not suggesting for a moment that they are not. The Chişinău statement made in Moldova recently by the Prime Minister was striking, as were the recent raids by the National Crime Agency in tackling criminals involved in this area.

Continue reading “Illegal Migration Bill: Archbishop of Canterbury tables amendment requiring government collaboration strategy to tackle global refugee crisis”

Illegal Migration Bill: Archbishop of Canterbury tables amendments on strategy to tackle human trafficking

During a committee debate on 14th June 2023, the Archbishop of Canterbury tabled two amendments to the Illegal Migration Bill. The first amendment would insert a new clause to the bill requiring the Secretary of State to have a ten year strategy for collaborating internationally to tackle human trafficking into the UK. The Archbishop also spoke in favour of a supplementary amendment, 144A:

The Lord Archbishop of Canterbury: My Lords, I introduce Amendment 139C, tabled in my name, and Amendment 144A, which is consequential to it. I thank the noble Lords, Lord Blunkett, Lord Kirkhope of Harrogate and Lord Hunt of Kings Heath, for co-signing it.

The amendment requires the Secretary of State to prepare a 10-year strategy for tackling human trafficking, in collaboration with international partners on this issue. A statement of policies for implementing the strategy must be presented to Parliament within a year of the Bill becoming law and every following year. Each time that a statement is made, an opportunity must be given for both Houses to debate and vote on it via a Motion for resolution.

The amendment, and my second amendment, relating to a 10-year strategy for an international refugee policy, are far from wrecking or negative amendments but seek to improve the Bill, as is our duty and right in this House. As I said at Second Reading, we need a Bill to reform migration and we need to stop the boats, but this Bill does not contain within it a sense of the long- term and global nature of the challenges that we face. To deal with global challenges, we need to engage in international collaboration towards global solutions.

Continue reading “Illegal Migration Bill: Archbishop of Canterbury tables amendments on strategy to tackle human trafficking”